fix: FindInBatches Limit zero
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b19b51425
commit
f9a86e9148
@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ func (db *DB) FindInBatches(dest interface{}, batchSize int, fc func(tx *DB, bat
|
||||
if limit, ok := c.Expression.(clause.Limit); ok {
|
||||
totalSize = limit.Limit
|
||||
|
||||
if batchSize > totalSize {
|
||||
if totalSize > 0 && batchSize > totalSize {
|
||||
batchSize = totalSize
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -330,14 +330,24 @@ func TestFindInBatchesWithOffsetLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
AssertEqual(t, results[i], targetUsers[i])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var sub1 []User
|
||||
// limit < batchSize
|
||||
if result := DB.Limit(5).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub, 10, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
|
||||
if result := DB.Limit(5).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub1, 10, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}); result.Error != nil || result.RowsAffected != 5 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Failed to batch find, got error %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if result := DB.Limit(4).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub, 2, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
|
||||
var sub2 []User
|
||||
// only offset
|
||||
if result := DB.Offset(3).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub2, 2, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}); result.Error != nil || result.RowsAffected != 7 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Failed to batch find, got error %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var sub3 []User
|
||||
if result := DB.Limit(4).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub3, 2, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}); result.Error != nil || result.RowsAffected != 4 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Failed to batch find, got error %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user